The existence of God and His Oneness is known through reason and revelation. explains that the Oneness of God and His nature is known through revelation
Revelation
A simpler way to provide evidence of the unity of God refers to the revelation. The argument here is that if God Himself has given to mankind and that this revelation can prove it, then he says of himself is obviously true . Bold hypotheses , perspective, at least , agnostic , how are you aware that God himself has announced to mankind and how is this revelation? Perspective
Take the last first hypothesis. If God Himself has given to mankind there are only two ways to know : external and internal . What do I mean by " in house" , is that you can know who God only through introspection and internalization and what we mean by "outside" is that you can know who God outside yourself through communication , that is, you create an instance in the world of independent spirit. Knowing God is internal plausible for the following reasons , One
1) Human beings are different. They have what psychologists call " individual differences " , these individual differences include DNA , experiments , social, intellectual and emotional ability , gender, among many others. These differences have a role in their ability to internalize through introspection or intuition , therefore , the results of introspection or trust your intuition will be different. So you can see that if these processes are used only for the knowledge of God , there would be inevitable differences in our understanding of it . This is the case of a historical perspective , from the ancient world 6000 BC , there are records of about 3700 different names and concepts of God ! One
2) Since the method used to conclude that God exists is a method of "common sense" , or what philosophers call rational thought and Muslim theologians W hat can call the innate idea , then try to know God within leads to errors . This is because it can be concluded with the universe as evidence of a transcendent cause beyond is that it must be eternal , unique , powerful , personal , anything else would be speculation. One The Qur'an rightly says " Why are you telling God that you have no knowledge ? " If you try to assimilate what God would be the equivalent of a mouse trying to conceptualize and think like an elephant. Obviously , the human being is not eternal , unique and powerful , so that human beings can not conceptualize God is. God says via external revelation . Perspective
Consider the following example into consideration , you know that God exists as the sound of the door , it is assumed that something is there, but do you know who is ? You do not expect anyone , so shout " Who is this ? " Knowing , and the only way to know is if the person behind the door says . Therefore, we can conclude that if God has said or announced anything should be external to the human being.
From the Islamic point of view this external communication is the Qur'an , as it is the only text to say is from God , that meets the criteria of a divine text These criteria include ,
1) Must be compatible with the God find rational and intuitive. For example , if a book says God is an elephant with 40 weapons would assume that this book is not of God , that God should be external to the universe. Perspective
2) Must be consistent internally and externally. In other words , if it says on page 20 that God is one and then on page 340 of his said that God is three, which is an internal inconsistency . Also, if the book says that the universe is only 6,000 years old, then it would be inconsistent as external reality as we know that the universe is 6,000 years older . One
3 ) There should be no signs of transcendence. In simple terms , you must have evidence to prove it is from God.
In the case of the Qur'an - and this post is not the place to discuss in depth - can not be explained by naturalistic explanations are both supernatural explanation. Some of these symptoms include :
a) The inimitable linguistic and literary
b ) There are historical accounts that could not be known to man at the time of revelation One
c ) There are descriptions of natural phenomena that can not be known to man at the time of revelation
To conclude , since the only way to know what God has announced to humanity is external revelation , and this revelation can prove that the Qur'an - so what it says about God is true . In the context of this discussion , the Quran says : "Know that the Lord is One."
concluded
These are some of the arguments that can be used to show that God is one, but this topic - once really understood - will have profound effects on human consciousness . The unity of God is not only related to the fact that it is one, but refers to the worship , Lordship , names and attributes , which can be enjoyed in reality meditate , meditating on the meaning of the Quran and become in a demonstration of your message . One
Read more ...
The existence of God and His Oneness is known by reason and revelation.
Explain why there must be a cause of the existence of the universe and that this issue should be
One of the most common questions asked during the course of Islamic education was " If God exists , why do we have to believe that one ? " This is important because it addresses a fundamental concept in Islamic theology , the concept of unity of God . The oneness of God, Tawhid in Arabic, is a central theme in the Quran and the message of all the prophets . God}}} Quran eloquently describes the nature of God and its uniqueness in Chapter 112: " Say: He is God, the only God is the one in which all creation depends for its livelihood spawned no, no ... No one generates comparable to him. " Perspective}}}
Before you begin to answer the question , it is important to add that the concept of unity in Islam is not limited to the uniqueness and oneness of God . One}}} There are many aspects of this concept that involves how humans should worship God, must understand how his lordship , and how to include the names and attributes of God . It does not stop there, as these ideas become the world view and perspective of an individual, as a famous thinker wrote subcontinent : Perspective}}}
" A believer in this ... can never be limited in its perspective . He believes in a God who is the Creator of heaven and earth , the Lord of the East and the West and Sustainer of the whole universe . According to this belief , not you consider anything in the world as a stranger to himself. God}}} he looks everything in the universe as belonging to the same Lord himself belongs . their sympathy for the love and service is not limited to an area or a particular group. One}}} their vision expands, his intellectual horizon widens, and his gaze becomes as liberal and as boundless as the kingdom of God. How this breadth of vision and breadth of vision can be achieved by an atheist , a polytheist or one who believes in a god supposed to possess limited and defective powers like a man? " Perspective}}}
In light of this, there are several ways to answer the question about the uniqueness and oneness of God , providing a positive case for the unity of God , and they range from theological to philosophical arguments . One}}} I will present the following five arguments :
1) Occam 's razor ' s
2) logical argument
3) conceptual differentiation
4) Uniqueness
5 ) Apocalypse
Occam's Razor ' s
The Quran rhetorically asks the question " the universe came from nothing ? " The answer seems pretty obvious from the undeniable logic and metaphysics that whatever begins to exist has a cause, and since I started the universe exists, which must have a cause . One}}} would be unreasonable to ask for more of a cause for the universe as an infinite regress of causes is impossible. the reasons are actually infinite absurdity of existing in reality, consider the following examples, Perspective}}}
1) You have an infinite number of people in a room , if I take away two , how was it ? The response is lower than the two infinite. But is it logical? If less than an infinite number of people in a room , you should be able to count the number in the real world. But you can not , in other words, the infinite has no meaning in the real world . In light of this mathematical state Kasman and Newman "endless certainly does not exist in the same sense that we say : " There are fish in the sea " God}}}
2 ) Imagine that I am a soldier and I want to make an enemy . Take me, I must ask permission from the soldier behind me to shoot, but you have to ask permission from the soldiers behind him to shoot, now imagine that goes on forever , that is, an infinite amount of time? Will I shoot the enemy ? The obvious answer is obvious. Similarly an infinite regress of causes for the universe would mean no life in the universe , in the first place. God}}}
So the conclusion that the universe has a single uncaused cause seems quite plausible independent , but you can always ask a plurality of causes occur simultaneously . Is this a valid argument ? I think there is a strong argument if we considered Ockham 's razor . Ockham 's razor is a philosophical principle attributed to the 14th century logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham . He goes first "is not sinusoidal ponenda Pluralitas require " English " Plurality should not be raised without necessity. " In other words , the simplest explanation is the most complete and best explanation . God}}}
Essentially this means that in the absence of any evidence or lack of need for a plurality of reasons , we have to keep the explanation simple full . In this case , we have no evidence to say that the cause of the universe is actually a combination of two , three or even thousands of reasons to explain the easiest and most complete is that this cause is . Apply a plurality of causes does not add to the completeness of the discussion. In other words , to add more causes not improve the explanatory power or scope of the discussion. For example , say that the universe was caused by a powerful also full because that statement is due to two powerful causes everyone. Due to a powerful cause is all that is necessary, simply because it is powerful. God}}}
A statement that the argument is that if we apply this principle to the Egyptian pyramids adopt the absurd view that was made by one person . However, it is a misapplication of the principle . Given that the pyramids were built by a person is not actually the simplest explanation and more complete because it raises many more questions than answers. For example , how a man can build the pyramids ? It is much wider for application was built by many men. God}}} In light of this, one can say that the universe is so complex that it would be absurd to suppose that it was created by one person . This statement , while true , is misplaced . A powerful being created the entire universe is a more consistent and easier than a plurality of causes much explanation . God}}} Now , critical and can still claim that the pyramids could then have been built by an all-powerful . But the problem is that there is nothing in the universe is an all-powerful , and that the pyramids were built by an efficient cause ( a person or persons acting ) continues to be the same type of case. God}}}
Read more ...
